Skip to content

Troubling racism

When racism is the topic at hand, in a public arena anyway, my experience is that people fall into the wallpaper.  Or at least respond with a disapproving sniff and stiffened spine.  It is a topic that provokes a fair amount of defensiveness and no doubt anxiety, which is a bugger given that what I really want to shift to talking about is, as bell hooks calls it, white supremacist ideology (and patriarchal, and capitalist).  Far more useful, and I would say apt – but at this point perhaps a step too far, though I’m working towards it – trust me…

Racism has formed the backbone of more conversations than I care or am able to remember.  For me, and the people I care about, it really is that important.  And that pervasive.  Lately I’ve noticed that when students ask me whether I think their work or their presentation (of which the issue of racism is often a part) is too radical or controversial I have to shrug and admit I’ve lost all perspective on the matter.  It is so much a part of the daily fare of my life and discussions with friends and to a lesser extent whānau, that what strikes me as completely normal and unquestionable often provokes outrage in alternate audiences (some might even say universes).  I used to try and keep up with the popular discourse through agonising hours spent listening to talkback radio – it was a useful exercise allowing me to hone my ability to counter even the most outrageous ‘race’-based claims (and not of the Brash-type fantasy).  I’ll revisit it occasionally, but I’ve lost too many radios (smashed against the bedroom wall) and grown tired of the rinse-wash-repeat style arguments to bother much.  On top of this, despite the tedious repetition, the truth is the willful ignorance such rhetoric implies is kinda painful.

Thanks to the wonders of the Facebook-kumera-vine (and this is the only way I get my ‘news’ these days, since I can no longer stomach the gossip that masquerades as news in television/radio/newspapers) I stumbled across a recently published article – Unspoken racism endemic in NZ.  Racism has had a fair bit of play in the media of late, this on the heels of “dangerous, stirring, radical, troublemaker” Professor Margaret Mutu’s comments on white immigration, which outraged those much more comfortable when the real problem is highlighted – those brown, shifty looking immigrants.  To add to the mix the previously written about flash mob haka that have featured in the 2011 RWC buildup and the RWC opening itself have sparked indignation by some at the continual shoving of that pre-historic culture down one’s throat (oh, the irony.  Do tell me about the agonies of forced assimilation white person).  Having written on racism as a postgraduate student, and driven to understand this thing that felt so omni-present in my life (and yet I was assured was soooo last century) I have read about everything on this topic I could lay my grubby little hands on.  When it comes to accusations of racism in Aotearoa I have come to the conclusion that such accusations don’t serve the interests of Māori at all, or our often similarly maligned brown or Asian immigrant brothers and sisters (although stay away from those white ones, aye Margaret?).  They serve the dominant group – white people.  While some may offer in their discomfort the assurance that hey, at least we’re talking about it, too often the conversation is one-sided and presented in such a way that only entrenches problematic understandings and attributions of the term.  The aforementioned article may be one of them.

First, despite the promising title, in content such articles perpetuate the widely held myth that racism is the inherent property of individuals – the result of a poor attitude or faulty cognition.  Thanks Psychology.  If only those prone to such maladies would apply themselves to eradicating or mending the error of their ways the issue of racism would be null and void.  Here’s the problem with this idea.  It reduces racism to shitty attitudes or behaviours that a person or group of people perpetuate on a demonised ‘other’.  What it allows for is the counter assertion that those privileged in the exercise of racism can claim to also be its victims.  “I once had a Māori call me white trash, I suffer racism too” is the beleaguered cry.  Logically, it fits and yet fails to capture the horror that racism lived entails.  As UK Health Science Professor Raj Bhopal puts it

Racism can cause death and despair in ways that are, with the exception of disease epidemics, almost unparalleled in human history (2006)

Further, in seeking remedy-to-racism, this kind of definition implies we need only implore those whose thoughts are in error to ‘try harder’, as the article author unsurprisingly does…

We all need to work on our thinking and attitudes so we can go forward together as the united and wonderfully diverse people of New Zealand that we aspire to be.

What gets hidden or subjugated in such definitions is the actual lived effects of racist practise.   Those little things like … I dunno … extensive removal of land and subsequently inter-generational poverty, mass incarceration, the disappearance of one’s history, the suppression of one’s language and all that entails, and so on and so forth. The sombre consideration of the level or degree of such effects renders the notion that these arise as the result of shitty attitudes a rather ridiculous one.  In reality the causes are complex and beyond the scope of this post, but far more damaging than individual instances of bigotry, no matter who they arise from, are hegemonic ideas.  We live in the type of post-colonial society that as Edward Said has argued are founded on an ideology of racism (and white supremacy) that continues long after the initial invasion has ended.  As Moana Jackson puts it

One of the great myths in this country is that colonisation has ended but no one has yet been able to tell me when it ended. And if colonisation is the systematic dispossession and the denial of rights and equality of indigenous peoples, then it definitely has not ended – Moana Jackson, 2010

When (un)settler societies implore their native peeps to “move on, it’s 170(ish) years ago dude, get over it” not only do they conveniently overlook the contemporary manifestations of colonial practice (Foreshore and Seabed Act I and II, anyone?) they also have no understanding that this ideological dominance persists or how it is maintained.  Someone I know once said in a thoroughly racist society blaming individuals for their racism is a bit like blaming a fish for being wet. Ae, tika. Best we start looking at the quality of the water.

Second, when white people point out the racism of other white people, it allows for a differentiation.  The very fact that ‘I’ discourage their racism means ‘I’ am therefore not myself racist.  I’m one of the good guys.  Of course that is not the intention, but we all know the road to hell is paved with good intentions, right? The sad part of writing a critique such as this one is its potential to discourage a genuine and perhaps even heartfelt desire on the part of the article’s author to respond to the issue at hand – to right/write the wrong so to speak.  The diatribes of a Paul Henry or Michael Laws seem so much more worthy of condemnation, and yet their blatant, unapologetic, apoplectic bigotry is so damned obvious they make the current article under examination that much sweeter by comparison.  Plus lets face it – they too easy.  I get that the mitigation of one’s own culpability is merely an unintended if fortuitous by-product.  And yet to let such common misinterpretations stand, given the seriousness of the topic, allows the perpetuation of the ideas embedded in articles such as this one.  Here a line is drawn in the sand of good and bad (attitudes and thoughts) and racism becomes the property of a few errant ‘extremists’ or ‘fringe dwellers’ (such as those often most easily characterised as racist – the neo-nazi skinhead) but the responsibility of all right thinking kiwis.

As New Zealanders we could all be thinking better about issues around the relationship between Maori and pakeha. We need to condemn thoughtless racism whenever it happens because such acts are never helpful. To borrow a Salvation Army slogan, “We’re all in this together.”

Thoughtless? Hmmm, I suspect (and suggest here) that thought, as in ideas, may be at its core.  Yes indeed, we all could be thinking better, but misconstruel of the meaning of racism aside, positing this as a ‘choice’ to be encouraged is a privilege in and of itself.  For some of us, our lives – as in our wellbeing and the wellbeing of our whanau, tamariki and so on, depend on it.  Hence while we may indeed be “all in this together”, some of us have more at stake than others.

16 Comments Post a comment
  1. Charlie Sweet #

    Gd,well written post,pity that ‘most’ of the citizens suffering from racial hubris,or whatever,are probably incapable of understanding the format that this is written in,and heres a thought,I am blue-eyed white boy,married to maori girl,So?when dumb ass people yell:niggaluvamuthafukr:or similair,does that also count as Racism?lol,

    September 23, 2011
    • Bearer of discomfort #

      It certainly counts as dumbass-ness Charlie ;). And my, what good taste in women you have … thanks for your comment!

      September 25, 2011
  2. John #

    Your causes listed as “extensive loss of land and subsequently inter-generational poverty, mass incarceration, the disappearance of one’s history, the suppression of one’s language and all that entails, and so on and so forth,” don’t hold up. Many an immigrant has come to NZ with nothing in their pocket. Many of them simply got stuck in, worked to build a life and some, even an empire. They didn’t dwell on the past, bitter about what they thought were the causes of their poverty. They avoided crime, probably because they realized incarceration would be counter-productive. They lived on the other side of the world, completely divorced from their history and language. Don’t make excuses. When Maori learn to value education, truthfulness, integrity, diligence, honesty commitment, etc., then the negative statistics will correct themselves. Unfortunately from what I witnessed at the opening of Ngawha prison, this future is unlikely. The visitors were elaborately welcomed into the prison as if this was the home of the Maori inmates. The white guys locked up there are far less likely to re-offend because life is so uncomfortable for them. They are in a very small minority and everything about the place has Maori “culture” written all over it.

    September 23, 2011
    • Bearer of discomfort #

      John it would be helpful when you claim to refute something if you actually had some evidence to back your assertions up. That you believe wholeheartedly what you espouse does not an informed argument make. The historical realities I list and you quote are well documented by even prominent Pakeha historians (see King, Bellich, Orange etc). That you believe comparing the indigenous experience to an immigrant/settler one is logical is frankly amusing. What is hidden in your argument is the also well documented reality that settlers who came walked into a country who’s systems (judicial, educational, and so on and so forth) were organised according to their own world view. reflected their values, were conducted in their language, and gave them significant assistance through illegitimate land transfer and in some instances gifting (see post-World War I, as well as South Island high country farmer settlements).

      When Maori learn to value education, truthfulness, integrity, diligence, honesty commitment, etc., then the negative statistics will correct themselves.

      Good lord. I struggle to believe you have no knowledge whatsoever of the intricate Maori education systems (wananga) that existed prior to and following the colonial process… oh wait, you conflate education with ‘school’, as in the ones settlers introduced, right? Education has always been valued amongst Maori, indoctrination has not.

      As for truthfulness and integrity I refer you to the founding document of the country, Te Tiriti o Waitangi and ask who displays a lack of truthfulness and integrity?? And for honesty and commitment, I’m not sure if you are aware these are simply similes for truthfulness and integrity, so perhaps your own education could do with improvement. And there’s the rub really, I feel that I’m not debating with someone who comes bearing enough weaponry (of the mind) to do justice to a decent argument. I don’t know what you do for a living, but if you were a mechanic say, I wouldn’t challenge you on your understanding of cars without first having done a decent amount of research on the topic myself. That would be foolish. And some might say arrogant. So I thank you for your opinion, but next time please bring an informed argument. Otherwise call Newstalk ZB/Radio Live – they welcome your style of rhetoric with open arms. Cheers.

      September 25, 2011
  3. Tarsh #

    Tautoko your whakaro. I often hear well meaning peeps condeem Don Brash and Michael Laws for their racist ideologies, but they tend to be the same that similarly label the likes of Magaret Mutu and Hone with the same brush. It seems anyone taking a firm stand on issues of race can be so labelled. (Perhaps even you my friend). I guess in current times we prefer our racism a little more evasive. But as some fella called Wiremu said “a rose by any other name is still a rose.” Rebelian suppresion act = Terrorist suppression act, Assimilation = Shoving culture down our throats, Foreshore and seabed act = Marine and coastal act, White supremacy = we’re all New Zealander’s etc, etc. I guess the fact that only one culture benefits from maintaining the status quo is irrelevant to those in the group receiving those benefits. Racism may be a tricky beast to hunt down, but I can’t help but see it everywhere. Maybe I’m a racist too, but sometimes you just gotta say a big Fuck You, I’m mad as hell, and I’m not gona take it anymore.

    From you know who

    September 24, 2011
    • Bearer of discomfort #

      I’m with you seditious one 🙂

      September 26, 2011
  4. John as a white immigrant who arrived here with nothing I write I completely agree with the authors views. I am part of a system where by the colour of my skin gives me advantages over others. That has nothing to do with how hard I work, or how much money and property I have accrued. Sometimes those advantages are seen and sometimes they are not, bu they are always there. And if I have privilege then that means there are those that don’t. Your telling Maori to be good little participants in that very system doesn’t wash. Just start asking yourself WHY? after you trot out the stats and figures in regards to Maori incareration rates, health, unemployment, ect.

    September 25, 2011
  5. Waka #

    Not only is the water filthy but its rising; imposing its constitution on other habitats. Flightless birds that were initially compelled to adapt to these submerged conditions have become accustomed to flapping wet wings and holding their breath. The process of decolonising the minds of the colonised is not simply a matter of convincing a submerged bird with a knack for holding its breath that it is not fish. At some point the fish themselves have to come to the realisation that there is a whole other world beyond theirs from whence these odd swimming feathery and beaked fish have come.

    September 26, 2011
    • Bearer of discomfort #

      Sounds like the lead in to a fairly decent thesis to me…

      Mereana Pitman says that what we do brilliantly, as Maori, is story-telling through metaphors/analogies. Perhaps what Moana means by ‘Once were poets’. Some of us more than others it seems.

      Qstn: do those underwater birds have flippers and a snorkel then? (Its rhetorical)

      September 27, 2011
  6. Ngaa Rauuira #

    And the rednecks go bonkers!

    September 28, 2011
    • Bearer of discomfort #

      Ha! Then best they keep reading, cos its only gonna get worse … 😉

      September 28, 2011
  7. Simon #

    Wow, I read John’s comment thinking it was superb satire, depressingly it isn’t! He could of just said “harden up”. B.o.d, I was led to your today blog via Maui street currently reading it back to front. Following with interest. Wicked!

    October 26, 2011
  8. Bearer of discomfort #

    Thanks Simon – nau mai, haere mai!

    October 27, 2011

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The promise of Mana, truth telling, and the struggle of ideas | Tūrangawaewae
  2. Downing the Brown: When two tribes go to war | Turangawaewae

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: